The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay - 1124 Words

Discrimination in the workplace is typified by failure to treat individuals equally due to biases against various group membership (Triana, Jayasinghe, Pieper, 2015). The United States enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1964, known as Title VII, to outlaw workplace discrimination of individuals with respect to compensation, terms, conditions of employment, or privileges of employment because of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. Following Title VII, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was established to enforce Title VII protocols in the public and private sector (Crumpacker Crumpacker, 2007). Proceeding 1964, several addendums were legislated to include protection against discrimination for individuals with respect to: sexual orientation, age, disability, pregnancy, and genetic information (Brooks, Doughtery, Price, 2015). The engagement of any employer in discrimination against members of any previously listed affiliations is not only deemed unethical, but is also considered unlawful in the United States. Despite the laws and protections that have been established, workplace discrimination is still reported as a common occurrence in the U.S (Triana, Jayasinghe, Pieper, 2015). The subsequent sections will examine a case of workplace discrimination as described by Monica Harwell, an African-American woman working for Con Edison, in New York. A consequent discussion of Monica’s account of discrimination evaluates the case in terms ofShow MoreRelatedCivil Rights Act of 19641840 Words   |  8 PagesBefore the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation in the United States was commonly practiced in many of the Southern and Border States. This segregation while supposed to be separate but equal, was hardly that. Blacks in the South were discriminated against repeatedly while laws did nothing to protect their individual rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ridded the nation of this legal segregation and cleared a path towards equality and integration. The passage of this Act, while f orever alteringRead More Civil Rights Act of 1964 Essay1338 Words   |  6 Pages The Civil Rights Act of 1964 resulted from one of the most controversial House and Senate debates in history. It was also the biggest piece of civil rights legislation ever passed. The bill actually evolved from previous civil rights bills in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. The bill passed through both houses finally on July 2, 1964 and was signed into law at 6:55 P.M. EST by President Lyndon Johnson. The act was originally drawn up in 1962 under President Kennedy before his assassinationRead MoreEssay on Civil Rights Act of 19646131 Words   |  25 PagesThe Civil Rights Act of 1964 Danielle Endler Human Resources 4050, Spring 2013 Semester Professor David Penkrot May 3, 2013 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is considered by some to be one of the most important laws in American history. (The Most Important Cases, Speeches, Laws Documents in American History) This Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964 and it is a â€Å"comprehensive federal statute aimed at reducing discrimination in public accommodations and employmentRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 1964879 Words   |  4 PagesPresident John F. Kennedy s New Frontier programs, Johnson wanted to expand civil rights and wage war on poverty. More than fifty years later, the effects of the Great Society on American life can still be felt. Civil rights fell under the scope of Johnson s Great Society programs. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a law that ended discrimination in the US at all levels of government. Without the Civil Rights Act of 1964, blacks and other people of color would not have the opportunity to runRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 1964925 Words   |  4 PagesAmericans and even immigrants are afforded their basic civil rights based on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The act, which was signed into law on July 2, 1964, declared all discrimination for any reason based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin will be deemed illegal in the United States (National Park Service, n.d.). When the act was enacted, people had to become more open minded; more accepting to the various cultures and backgrounds of individuals. Understanding that concept leadsRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 1964848 Words   |  4 PagesVII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, followed by a brief description of person al experiences involving discrimination, and concluding with a reflection as to how the American workforce is protected by law. The writing will cover any ethically related issues, personal thoughts and ideas, and illustrations of how the law pertains directly to personal events, as well as provide direct links to any and all reference material covered under the purpose of this writing. Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 TheRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 19641702 Words   |  7 Pagessubject to, and the subject of, discrimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 originally did not include gender in the bill’s wording. Were it not for a backhanded comment made in jest by a backward congressman, women would not have been afforded equal rights protection in employment (Freeman, 1991; 2004). President Harry Truman inaugurated the legal Civil Rights Movement. Though people of color had long been yearning and fighting for their rights, President Truman began this legal process nationallyRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 19641106 Words   |  5 Pages†(Cassanello). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most influential event in the Civil Rights Movement because it paved way for ending discrimination and segregation, and giving more rights to African- Americans. During the Civil Rights Movement African- Americans were fighting to get their rights that were being taken away from them little by little. Starting in 1955 and going well into the late 1960’s early 1970’s, African- Americans started to protest against discriminatory laws and acts such as JimRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 1964880 Words   |  4 Pagesbetween conflicting viewpoints are still being faced by Americans today. (Tiona/Claire) Equality for African Americans has made remarkable progress since the approval of the Civil Rights Act, but discrimination continues. A significant step towards racial equality was the Civil Rights Act of 1964, proposed by John F. Kennedy. This act brought an end to segregation in public facilities such as buses, restaurants, hotels, and places of entertainment. It also banned employment discrimination on the termsRead MoreThe Civil Right Act Of 19641072 Words   |  5 PagesTitle VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964, and both under the Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact. Dunlap feels that he has been discriminated during the interview process. The district court concluded that TVAs subjective hiring process permitted racial bias against the plaintiff and other black job applicants. Tennessee Valley Authorities was found guilty of discrimination against the plaintiff. The Title Vii of the Civil Right Act of 1964 enforces the constitutional right to vote, to confer

Socrates Was Wise About God - 1633 Words

Kara Osborne Phil. 120 November 18, 2014 Socrates was wise about God As an attempt to prove that Socrates was wise about God the true meaning of wisdom has to be defined in all of its terms. Socrates was wise because God told him that no one was wiser than he. But, what makes a person wise, what are the defining characteristics of wisdom for one to be considered wise? To start this conversation about what makes a person wise is to define what the literal meaning of Wisdom is. Wisdom is rooted in the Indo-European word stem of â€Å"woid, weid, wid† that means â€Å"to see† (Mohr, 3) Just by examining this definition wisdom can be described as a type of sight. The ability to see something is uniting in it of itself of one object, the seer, to another object. Wisdom being a type of sight is a connection between the knower of something in conjunction with the known. As given in class, the knower of chemistry knows about matter and the other physical sciences can related to a specific subject. But, what is someone is the knower of Wisdom, w hat do they know? If someone is the knower of Wisdom they know communication, love, and they know God. Before the idea of the knower of wisdom can be discussed knowledge must be defined. There are two types of knowledge, theoretical and practical. Theoretical is from the Greek verb â€Å"theorein† which means to look at, which is knowledge for its own sake. Practical knowledge on the other hand comes from the Greek verb â€Å"prassein† which means to passShow MoreRelatedSocrates Was Wise About God1920 Words   |  8 PagesFarishta Abdullahi Phil. 120 November 13, 2015 Socrates was wise about God In order to determine whether or not Socrates was wise about God, we must first define the term â€Å"wise† in this context. What is the definition of wisdom? What makes someone wise? The literal meaning, or etymology, of the word is derived from the Indo-European stem woid which means to see. It also relates to similar words such as the Greek idein and the Latin videre, both also meaning â€Å"to see† (Mohr, pg. 3). Whereas, in EnglishRead More Socrates Essay1087 Words   |  5 PagesThe problem remains making philosophy friendly to politics. The questioning of authoritative opinions is not easily accomplished nor is that realm of philosophy - the pursuit of wisdom. Socrates was the instigator of the conflict. While the political element takes place within opinions about political life, Socrates asks the question quot;What is the best regime and how should I live?quot; Ancient thought is riddled with unknowns and can make no such statement as quot;how should I live.quot; TheRead MoreSocrates Essay728 Words   |  3 PagesSocrates Socrates spent his time questioning people about things like virtue, justice, piety and truth. The people Socrates questioned are the people that condemned him to death. Socrates was sentenced to death because people did not like him and they wanted to shut him up for good. There was not any real evidence against Socrates to prove the accusations against him. Socrates was condemned for three major reasons: he told important people exactly what he thought of them, he questioned ideasRead MoreSocrates Argument Of Wisdom1673 Words   |  7 Pagesthey just bring things into question. A specific situation is Socrates’ defense in The Apology. One could assume that the gentlemen of the law were closely examining and judging Socrates’ words and statements, but possibly more than the gentlemen, philosophers examine Socrates’ words through the text. Many thinkers have found great and small contradictions throughout, one concerning Socrates’ statements of wisdom. I n The Apology Socrates states that he has no claim to wisdom, yet he appears to haveRead MoreThe Philosophies Of The Philosopher Socrates1463 Words   |  6 PagesPHI150 21 March 2017 Socrates This paper will examine, in two parts, the worldviews of the philosopher Socrates. The first part will examine four of his worldviews using evidence from The Apology, The Crito, and The Phaedo, all written by Plato and depicting dialogues from Socrates. The first section of the paper will also use supplementary analysis from Socrates by George Rudebusch. The second section of this paper will be a critique of Socrate’s worldviews. Part 1: Socrates’ Worldview KnowledgeRead MoreEssay about The Search for Wisdom799 Words   |  4 Pagesthe ages; knowledgequot;. Platos Socrates indicates that wisdom is the acknowledgement of ignorance. This statement may be hard to prove as true. If a deaf and dumb man came to realize that he knew nothing, because he is not able to learn it, does this make him wise? I do not believe so. Then, if a prominent professor who has studied for years and has learned many things, comes to believe that he is ignorant to the true ways of the world, does that make him wise? Possibly so. So, what is the differenceRead MoreThe Apology Of Socrates And Hebrew Bible Analysis1676 Words   |  7 PagesIn the Apology of Socrates and Hebrew Bible, there are different structures of authority – the way the system works; people live their lives, or how they view their world. The Greek gods and the Hebrew God shape these people’s views and give them a sense of authority. The structures of authority evidently show in the Apology of Socrates while Socrates defends himself in court, and in the books of the Bible when the Jews follow God and how they judge others. Although the Athenians’ and Jews’ livesRead MoreThe Death Of Socrates And Jesus1427 Words   |  6 PagesSocrates and Jesus were two teachers whose guidance people still follow today. They were both sentenced to death for their teachings even though there were witnesses to their innocence. Socrates was accused of corrupting the youth and practicing atheism by three men, Lytus, Anytus, and Meletus. Plato, Socrates’ student, recorded Socrates’ defense speech. Socrates succeeded in getting some of the jury to see the truth, but in the end, he was sentenced to the death penalty. The Gospel of Luke is aRead MorePlatos The Allegory of the Cave as Means to Explain The Apology1672 Words   |  7 Pagesmeans to better decipher â€Å"The Apology of Socrates.† Plato himself never appears in either dialogue, b ut it is clear that he disagrees with how Socrates’s trial ended and hopes to prevent another unneeded execution in the future. In â€Å"The Apology of Socrates,† Socrates is accused of not recognizing the gods of the state and of corrupting the youth of Athens. Despite the many instances in which these allegations are challenged and, quite frankly, disproved, Socrates is still put to death. â€Å"The AllegoryRead MoreSocratesApology And The Hebrew Bible1493 Words   |  6 Pageshow they view their world. The people in Socrates’ Apology and the Hebrew Bible have different ways of life. The Greek gods and the Hebrew God shape these people’s views, and they live the way their Gods want them to. Socrates’ gods and the Jews’ God give them a sense of authority in how they live and view their world. It evidently shows in Socrates’ Apology while Socrates defends himself in court, and in the books of the Bible when the Jews follow God a nd how they judge before and after Jesus

Project Management Principles In The Orion Shield Case

Question: Describe about the Orion Shield Project. Answer: Introduction The Orion Shield Project is a case of what not to do when running a task. Gary Allison was relegated as the task chief for Scientific Engineering Corporation (SEC). He did not have experience as a project director and was misdirected by exploitative managers. The significance of project administration has been delineated over and over (Rosemann vom Brocke, 2015). The accomplishment of whole organizations can without much of a stretch lie in the capacities of system supervisors to meet the extension, calendar, and cost limitations for different activities. Without these capacities, organizations default on their legally binding commitments and lose considerable measures of cash for the organization. This contextual investigation breaks down a portion of the key slip-ups made by Gary Allison with respect to specialized, moral, legitimate, authoritative, and other project administration issues brought on by having an unpracticed and uncertified system chief. These issues are vital and assume a noteworthy part in the achievement of any undertaking (Todorovic et al., 2015). Gary Allison was an effective venture engineer for Scientific Engineering Corporation (SEC). In the wake of driving the innovative work endeavors to make a specialized proposition for another NASA venture, Gary Allison acknowledged a position as Program Manager for SEC. Henry Larsen, the executive of designing, was Gary's unrivaled (Niemi Laine, 2016). There were numerous issues concerning the Orion Shield extend once Gary Allison turned into the Program Manager and this paper will distinguish and talk about specialized, moral, lawful, legally binding, and other venture administration issues confronted amid the undertaking. Violation of Project Management Principles and Technical Issues Keeping up and watching moral standards of behavior ought to be a necessity for all anticipate chiefs. Inability to watch a moral set of accepted rules amid the Orion Shield venture delivered numerous moral issues that brought about the poor finish of the undertaking. These issues can be ascribed to each individual from the task (Janssen, Van Der Voort van Veenstra, 2015). Gary recognized the nearness of specialized issues amid the starting phase of the venture. Rather, he permitted the Director of Engineering, Henry Larson, to pressure him into feigning the proposition accommodation. Had he legitimately reported the revelation of not having the capacity to meet the determination prerequisites, STI may have made a remittance in the agreement by changing the agreement sort, degree, or expense to oblige the extra innovative work endeavors (Wasson, 2015). At the onset of the undertaking, Gary demonstrated that he did not have an exceptionally crucial competency comprehension of the task environment. The undertaking's surroundings is the social, social, and authoritative components of the task. A sharp comprehension of a task's domain would permit an undertaking administrator to recognize the venture's partners, realize whose sentiment matters, and who advantages and experiences the work performed (Niemi Laine, 2016). On the off chance that Gary had this understanding, he would have realized that most undertakings experience assets, limitations, and different strengths that both empower and preclude a venture from being fruitful. There were a few specialized complexities tormenting Gary Allison from the begin concerning the advancement of the item. Most importantly, SEC presented a proposition to Space Technology Industries (STI) in light of falsehoods. The RFP's specialized particulars expressed that "all segments must have the capacity to work typically and effectively through a temperature scope of - 65 degrees F to 145 degrees F (The Orion Shield Project). The underlying testing of the item created by SEC showed that it could not withstand temperatures more than 130 degrees F (Turner, 2016). Gary Allison had an awesome handle on the specialized parts of the undertaking. In any case, regardless he worked as a designer and not as a system administrator. He had no learning of the regulatory capacities and appeared to be ill-equipped at the primary specialized meeting on the grounds that there was not a motivation or freebees accommodated STI. Regardless of the fact that the specialized information is spot on point, if the data can't be effectively passed on to the partners required without suitable managerial capacities occurring. Gary Allison performed more as a specialized representative than as a Program Manager (Binder 2016). One of the three key achievement elements for any undertaking is to have conveyance of the item to the right determinations and quality called for in the agreement. SEC began the wrong foot by being untrustworthy in their proposition. Henry Larsen purposefully allocated the position to Gary Allison despite the fact that he had qualified undertaking chiefs. He needed to utilize Gary's absence of information and skill to his support to control the circumstance (Rosemann vom Brocke, 2015). Larsen was greatly unscrupulous in requesting that Gary be untrustworthy. There is no infringement of standards if there should be an occurrence of Elliott Gray and Paula Arnold. Structural and Cultural Issues While the Orion Shield project was under implementation, numerous moral and legitimate issues emerged. These moral and legitimate issues included infringement of legally binding prerequisites that were activated by the included gatherings. These issues were further aggravated by the disappointment of senior administration to nearly regulate to the venture director amid the term of the undertaking (Austin Pinkleton, 2015). Shockingly the SEC does not require the generation of legitimate and honest documentation. The main moral issue emerged when Larson urged Gary to make false claims about the parts. The section is expressing that the parts were operable at 155 F degrees despite the fact that the present outlines restricted operations at 130 F degrees made the main moral amid the venture. Lack of Effective Communication As expressed by Ghobadi Mathiassen (2016), morals is an arrangement of rule that aide basic leadership taking into account individual estimations of what is correct versus what isn't right. PMI actualized a Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct that ought to be trailed by all Program Managers. Gary Allison committed a few key errors since he didn't take after the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (Todorovic et al., 2015). As a matter of first importance, Gary was unscrupulous when he permitted himself to be impacted by his supervisor Henry Larsen. Gary ought to have informed the client reality regarding the items powerlessness to withstand the warmth instead of lie amid the last proposition to the organization. Furthermore, Gary acknowledged the position as system administrator and he did not have the foundation, experience, aptitudes, or capabilities for the occupation (Bryman Bell, 2015). He was not confirmed as a Project Management Professional and did not have any forma l preparing on the best way to effectively lead a task. Thusly, he risked his own employment and position in the organization and also the productivity of SEC all in all. Requirement of different advice and ethical issues The second moral issue amid the undertaking can be found in the absence of supervision amid the task. As the chief of operations, Larsen ought to have been accessible for basic outlines choices that were made amid the underlying phases of the venture. As the executive of operations, Larsen ought to have stayed accessible and administered Gary's work (Bryman, 2015). In any case, while Larsen neglected to manage Gary's choices about the task he did not delay to administer Gary's method of transportation. Moreover, it was unlawful for Gary and Henry to control the information for the proposition. The whole organization confronted a claim for rupture of agreement when they could not satisfy their end of the arrangement with the proposition they submitted. Venture chiefs ought to show straightforwardness in their basic leadership process. This moral concern likewise did not happen at SEC (McNiff, 2016). There were privileged insights kept from the workers at SEC, and in addition from the client, making Gary lose the appreciation and trust of his kindred associates. The partners, Space Technology Institute, were not educated about the utilization of another material nor were alternate representatives at SEC. The greater part of the partners were fairly resentful about Gary, despite the fact that it was Larsen who educated him to stay silent and to lie about where the financing originated from (Liu, Meng Fellows, 2015). Larsen deceptively utilized Gary to perform exploitative activities since Gary did not have the obliged learning to be a system administrator and was taking his recommendation from his dishonest manager. At long last, it was deceptive and untrustworthy of both Larsen and Gary to not uncover the utilization JXB-3 material to the customer. Because of the truth, that the SEC to test the new material utilized STI's assets, either Larsen, the Director of Operations or Gary, the task supervisor, ought to have seen STI (Vanclay et al., 2015). The greater part of the moral issues that happened amid the venture might be followed back to Gary's absence of experience as a Project Manager and Larsen's inability to oversee and Larsen's inappropriate supervision when he acted. Guidance for avoiding perception In an overall, Gary's own particular absence of supervision of the STI delegate added to the moral issues amid the venture. As a task supervisor Gary was at last in charge of the supervision of those under him, keeping the customers educated, and directing venture gatherings with partners (Alotaibi Mafimisebi, 2016). By neglecting to give a plan to STI and furnishing STI with meeting minutes, Gary fizzled in his moral obligations towards his customers. SEC was recompensed with a firm-settled value (FFP) contract. Theoretically, this kind of agreement ought to have a forthright nitty gritty degree definition and necessities definition. SEC ought not have acknowledged a FFP contract since they knew they didn't as of now have an item that would address the issues of STI. In this manner, they would never suspect the expense to deliver the item and they bear the majority of the expenses related for extra testing and things not recorded in the agreement (Kendrick, 2015). SEC presented a proposition without recognizing what it would cost to deliver a suitable part. A FFP Contract ought to just be utilized when the cost danger is negligible or can be anticipated to a reasonable level of conviction, which was not the situation in the Orion Shield case (Contract Types). It would have been a more shrewd decision for SEC to arrange for an expense in addition to time and materials contract. This sort of agreement takes into consideration more q uestions in the advancement of the item. SEC would have gotten a set benefit for finishing the agreement and the sum paid by STI would have fluctuated in like manner (Hornstein, 2015). This exchanges the danger from SEC to STI and this would be the best decision from SEC's perspective. In any case, FPP and expense in addition to time and materials are the two extremes of agreements. The perfect alternative for both sides would have been to make an agreement that spots insignificant dangers on both sides. A motivating force contract would have part the danger amongst SEC and STI. Because of the way that there was an instability in the venture cost, both sides would have accepted a portion of the danger, making the danger sum insignificant for each (David David, 2016). The agreement would have concentrated on an objective value, target benefit, and the extreme expense for the venture. Failure on Project Management Issues This area will fundamentally investigate the execution of a recently delegated venture administrator, Gary Allison, through his reaction to different issues that emerged amid the administration of The Orion Shield Project. In the investigation, I will altogether talk about the specialized, moral, lawful, legally binding, and change issues and Gary's reaction to each (Kendrick, 2015). The specialist will close my examination with a contemplated reasoning of what capabilities Gary does not have that forbid him from being a compelling venture director. There are three key achievement components influencing venture administration issues. They are on-time conveyance, conveyance inside spending plan, and conveyance to details and quality. Sadly, Gary Allison fizzled in each of the three of these components. He was not furnished with the abilities important to be a viable and fruitful system chief (Vanclay et al., 2015). His boss Henry Larsen likewise deluded him. Larsen advises Gary that he just should be conferred, to compose and talk well, and know how to spur individuals with a specific end goal to be effective. Gary neglected to see how vital his part was to the achievement of the project. Furthermore, Gary neglected to see the significance of good correspondence to the project. He didn't have forms set up that considered straightforwardness in the venture (Bryman, 2015; Bryman Bell, 2015). Gary was much of the time not able to see the bigger picture and did not have a reasonable vision for the venture. He did not effectively adj ust himself amongst specialized and regulatory obligations. Subsequently, he had constrained learning about the monetary allowance and financing. He over-distributed assets and assumed the fault when the whole venture kept running over spending plan. Conclusion Project Management is the art of arranging, sorting out, executing, and dealing with the assets expected to accomplish a particular objective. Powerful venture chiefs (PM) deliberately encourage the whole venture administration procedure to guarantee the undertaking's prosperity. To do this the PM should enough meet the particular necessities (that is time, degree, quality, and cost) put forward by the venture and its partners. It is estimated that PM must have an arrangement of center capabilities keeping in mind the end goal to effectively deal with an undertaking. Those capabilities are advancement of Project Management information zones, use of suitable task administration instruments and strategies, comprehension of the undertaking environment, ownership of initiative abilities, and general administrative and human relations aptitudes. Albeit after a brief meeting with Larsen he chose to delude STI. He misleadingly presented the proposition expressing the model SEC had developed will stay operable in temperatures coming to up to Based on this accommodation SEC was honored the agreement. Another moral issue that emerged was when Henry Larsen meddled in the spec necessity issue and made what he believed was an answer JBX3. To subsidize the testing of the new item, JBX3, Larsen demanded Gary tell STI that SEC had utilized free innovative work reserves. At the point when rather they had utilized STI's cash. Gary felt uneasy about both records of misdirection and felt it would doubtlessly prompt clash and client disappointment. References Alotaibi, A. B., Mafimisebi, O. P. (2016). Project Management Practice: Redefining Theoretical Challenges in the 21st Century.Project Management,7(1). Austin, E. W., Pinkleton, B. E. (2015).Strategic Public Relations Management: Planning and Managing Effective Communication Campaigns(Vol. 10). Routledge. Binder, J. (2016).Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. CRC Press. Bryman, A. (2015).Social research methods. Oxford university press. Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2015).Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA. David, F., David, F. R. (2016). Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases. Ghobadi, S., Mathiassen, L. (2016). Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in agile software teams.Information Systems Journal,26(2), 95-125. Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), 291-298. Janssen, M., Van Der Voort, H., van Veenstra, A. F. (2015). Failure of large transformation projects from the viewpoint of complex adaptive systems: Management principles for dealing with project dynamics.Information Systems Frontiers,17(1), 15-29. Kendrick, T. (2015).Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Liu, J., Meng, F., Fellows, R. (2015). An exploratory study of understanding project risk management from the perspective of national culture.International Journal of Project Management,33(3), 564-575. McNiff, J. (2016).You and your action research project. Routledge. Niemi, E., Laine, S. (2016, January). Competence management as a dynamic capability: a strategic enterprise system for a knowledge-intensive project organization. In2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)(pp. 4252-4261). IEEE. Rosemann, M., vom Brocke, J. (2015). The six core elements of business process management. InHandbook on Business Process Management 1(pp. 105-122). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Todorovic, M. L., Petrovic, D. C., Mihic, M. M., Obradovic, V. L., Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management.International Journal of Project Management,33(4), 772-783. Turner, R. (2016).Gower handbook of project management. Routledge. Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., Franks, D. M. (2015). Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Wasson, C. S. (2015).System Engineering Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices. John Wiley Sons.